In a city where people develop strong emotional and physical attachments to the communities, it is difficult not to be concerned about the services provided by the government. The Williamsburg Park in Brooklyn promised by Mayor Bill De Blasio's administration has not been built, sparking outrage amongst residents of that community. The park was initially said to have been a part of a deal in 2005 to construct residential buildings along the waterfront, within 28 acres of space. Hundreds of residents rallied at city hall on Thursday 12th about the broken promises of the government, and in hopes that the project could resume. The warehouse fire that occurred within parts of the park in February has caused a revival of the case. Councilman Steve Levin says "A promise is a promise" backing up the hundreds that rallied at City Hall. Residents are hoping Mayor De Blasio can strike a deal with corporations to complete the construction of the park and the residential condos.
Picture source: NYtimes
In News, The city has also allocated $15million to the construction of flood prevention barricades round Lower Manhattan. The city is taking serious measures to prevent future flooding like Hurricane sandy did in 2012. Majority of the Battery Park financial area were flooded including the train stations, parks, ferry station, and a number of other important places. Many residential houses were also flooded as power outage spread across the city, which accounted for perhaps one of the costly storms.
Above: flooded Battery Park tunnel entrance
A sum of $8 million plus $6.75 million were allocated from capital budget, that goes towards the the construction of flood protection in Battery Park and massive flood protection in Lower Manhattan respectively. An effort that might reduce the cost of rebuilding in the aftermath of future storms in New York city.
Saturday, March 14, 2015
Friday, March 13, 2015
Another look at the "Rooftop Highway" proposal
In the North
County, there has been a plan to build a four-lane highway (would be named
Interstate-98 or I-98 or nicknamed the “Rooftop Highway”) that would connect
I-81 in Watertown to I-87 in Champlain for many years.
“The proposed
Route 98 could reduce travel times and speed up commerce. Let’s see if we can
make it a reality. We’ve been talking about it for years. Let’s get DOT to
undertake a study and see if we can make this project happen” (said by Governor
Cuomo during 2014 State of State Address). Governor Cuomo has put aside $2.5
million to “undertake a study”.
This study is not the
first study to focus on the proposed Rooftop highway. Two studies took place in
2002 and 2006 and both studies resulted in the conclusion that Rooftop highway
“didn’t merit the investment”(Matt).
Joan McDonald, the Commissioner of the Department of Transportation (DOT) doesn’t completely rule
out the idea but she believes that “DOT “probably” wouldn’t end up building the
highway”, due the results from pass studies. Link to video of interview with
Joan McDonald http://nynow.org/post/dot-commissioner-says-i-98-rooftop-highway-unlikely
.
Currently, Route
11 runs fairly close to the proposed Rooftop highway would be constructed. Maybe
this is why the Rooftop Highway hasn’t made it far pass the proposal stage because
there as been many proposal to get this highway built since the 1950s. Also,
financial and environmentally issues come into play. The cost of constructing
the Rooftop highway (172 mile interstate) is estimated at $6 billion and
improvements to Route 11 are at $320 million (Project Discussion Overview).
“The Northern Corridor
Transportation Group is the primary advocacy organization working to develop
transportation alternatives in the North Country that will help spur economic
growth” (NCNOW News), which supports the Rooftop highway proposal.
This morning,
the Northern Corridor Transportation Group named Tony Arguiette as Chair.
Former Chairman Wade Davis believes that Arguiette experience in advocating for employment and job creation needs
in the North Country” and believes that “his leadership will help take the organization to the next level and I fully
support him in his new role” (NCNOW News).
With the funding for a new study to take place, it will be interesting to see the results and if the Rooftop highway will become a reality. Also, Arguiette might be a person to watch and see if he will prove himself as Chairman of the Northern Corridor Transportation Group.
Sources:
The Associated
Press. Syracuse.com. “Cuomo wants NY to look again at building Interstate 98
from Watertown to Champlain”. Received from http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2014/01/cuomo_wants_ny_to_look_again_at_building_interstate_highway_from_watertown_to_ch.html
NCNOW News. I-98
advocacy group names new chair in effort to bring highway to St. Lawrence
County”. Received from http://northcountrynow.com/news/i-98-advocacy-group-names-new-chair-effort-bring-highway-st-lawrence-county-0138667
Picture is from
The Northern Tier Expressway or The Rooftop Highway. Received from http://www.upstatenyroads.com/i98.shtml
Project Discussion Overview (February 25, 2014). Received
from
Ryan, Matt. New
York Now.“DOT Commissioner says I-98 “rooftop highway” is unlikely”. Received
from http://nynow.org/post/dot-commissioner-says-i-98-rooftop-highway-unlikely
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Growing strife amongst New York State Democrats
The New York Assembly in Albany had disapproved of Gov. Andrew Cuomo's bill to fund failing public schools, but this has created somewhat of strife between the Governor and Mayor Bill de Blasio who falls on the side on the Assembly. Strife created by the growing issue of increasing number of failing schools that should have been addressed long ago. As discussed in previous post, released report from the governor's office showed about half out of a total of 178 schools are short coming of the standards.
Large percent of these students are Minority and from low income families, and attend majority of these failing schools that makes up
about 9 out of 10 schools. While Mayor Bill de Blasio's proposal to maintain longer control of New York City schools had been accepted by the Assembly, Speaker Carl Heastie articulated reasons why Gov. Cuomo's education proposal wasn't approve. On that note, Mr Heastie replied saying “We must help our children to succeed, not punish them because they may
live in poorer communities or deny their schools the funding they need
to improve the learning environment”.
More party disagreement have come in form of Mr Heastie's willingness to support Mayor Bill de Blasio long-term control over NYC schools till 2020, as opposed to Gov. Cuomo's objection of the Mayor's control for only three years.
Above: New York Mayor Bill de Blasio left and Governor Andrew Cuomo right.
Mayor De Blasio who is supposedly great friends with the Governor has grown skeptical over his working relationship with the Governor. According to the Albany insider news obtained from Nydailynews blog, the Mayor is seeking to amend his relationship after the two have fallen out on the opposite side of the spectrum. On two occasions Gov. Cuomo has fallen out of favor with Mayor De Blasio's, the first occurred when the Governor refused a major housing project organized by the Mayor, and another occurred when both individuals had simultaneous events inside Capitol the building. The issue here is so much about which level of government controls where and what, and reforms that these levels of government can influence.
Another Democrat to have developed a bad relationship with the Governor is Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner. Mayor Miner has taken sides with Mayor De Blasio on the new proposed plan to take over schools in New York City.
Above: Mayor Stephanie Miner
New York State Senate Democrats have also grown sour over their relationship with the Governor, blaming him (Gov. Cuomo) for some short comings in the office. Senate Democratic leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins has also publicly criticized Governor Cuomo for actions against school teachers, and for also eliminating her from budget talks.
Above: Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins
Queens Democratic Assemblyman Jeff Aubry has also backed Stewart-Cousins by saying the Governor was wrong for not including her in the budget talk, as it raises questions about gender inequality and racism.
More party disagreement have come in form of Mr Heastie's willingness to support Mayor Bill de Blasio long-term control over NYC schools till 2020, as opposed to Gov. Cuomo's objection of the Mayor's control for only three years.
Above: New York Mayor Bill de Blasio left and Governor Andrew Cuomo right.
Mayor De Blasio who is supposedly great friends with the Governor has grown skeptical over his working relationship with the Governor. According to the Albany insider news obtained from Nydailynews blog, the Mayor is seeking to amend his relationship after the two have fallen out on the opposite side of the spectrum. On two occasions Gov. Cuomo has fallen out of favor with Mayor De Blasio's, the first occurred when the Governor refused a major housing project organized by the Mayor, and another occurred when both individuals had simultaneous events inside Capitol the building. The issue here is so much about which level of government controls where and what, and reforms that these levels of government can influence.
Another Democrat to have developed a bad relationship with the Governor is Syracuse Mayor Stephanie Miner. Mayor Miner has taken sides with Mayor De Blasio on the new proposed plan to take over schools in New York City.
Above: Mayor Stephanie Miner
New York State Senate Democrats have also grown sour over their relationship with the Governor, blaming him (Gov. Cuomo) for some short comings in the office. Senate Democratic leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins has also publicly criticized Governor Cuomo for actions against school teachers, and for also eliminating her from budget talks.
Above: Senator Andrea Stewart-Cousins
Queens Democratic Assemblyman Jeff Aubry has also backed Stewart-Cousins by saying the Governor was wrong for not including her in the budget talk, as it raises questions about gender inequality and racism.
Assembly Has Not Included Ethics Reform
On Tuesday of this week, we saw the release of the Assembly’s and Senate’s one-house budget resolutions. These resolutions show the policy priorities of each chamber before entering the closed door budget negotiations between the leaders from each chamber and the governor.
The Assembly’s $150.7 billion budget resolution does not include the ethics reform that was presented by Governor Cuomo through his 30-day budget amendments. Speaker Carl Heastie said “We haven’t come to a final position on ethics,”. The Speaker has long spoke out against the manner in which the ethics reform was tied to the budget. Speaker heastie sees “It kind of ties the Legislature’s hands.” Cuomo’s administration validated the use of the ethics amendments to the budget because the legislature has long avoided real ethics reform. The Speaker is not against ethics reform but has stated his discontent with the ethics reform only applying to the legislature and the way it was embedded into the budget.
Speaker Heastie would be more willing to negotiate the ethics reform if it was also applied to the executive. The Speaker keeps reminding the public of the $700,000 book deal that the Governor could receive for his memoir. Interestingly, Heastie did comment saying “There are certain things under the legislative guise should be protected and I do believe in that.” In a news conference outlining the Assembly’s one-house budget resolution the Speaker was“cagey” and “subdued’ about the details of ethics reform.
There was some mention of ethics reform in the Assembly’s resolution but the Speaker didn’t go into detail. As the resolution stands there would be the cutting back of contributions from limited liability corporations, restricting the use of campaign funds for personal use but no disclosure of outside income.
The Assembly’s $150.7 billion budget resolution does not include the ethics reform that was presented by Governor Cuomo through his 30-day budget amendments. Speaker Carl Heastie said “We haven’t come to a final position on ethics,”. The Speaker has long spoke out against the manner in which the ethics reform was tied to the budget. Speaker heastie sees “It kind of ties the Legislature’s hands.” Cuomo’s administration validated the use of the ethics amendments to the budget because the legislature has long avoided real ethics reform. The Speaker is not against ethics reform but has stated his discontent with the ethics reform only applying to the legislature and the way it was embedded into the budget.
Speaker Heastie would be more willing to negotiate the ethics reform if it was also applied to the executive. The Speaker keeps reminding the public of the $700,000 book deal that the Governor could receive for his memoir. Interestingly, Heastie did comment saying “There are certain things under the legislative guise should be protected and I do believe in that.” In a news conference outlining the Assembly’s one-house budget resolution the Speaker was“cagey” and “subdued’ about the details of ethics reform.
There was some mention of ethics reform in the Assembly’s resolution but the Speaker didn’t go into detail. As the resolution stands there would be the cutting back of contributions from limited liability corporations, restricting the use of campaign funds for personal use but no disclosure of outside income.
Tuesday, March 10, 2015
Rochester Teachers Rally against Cuomo
Teachers across the Rochester area gathered in a rally
against Governor Cuomo’s education plan on February 27th. Governor
Cuomo has pushed for a major reform of New York States education, to decease
the amount of failing schools and students, but also improve the teacher
evaluation process. Governor Cuomo also stated that he wants to close many of
the schools that have been in constant failure over the past years, and some of
those schools reside in Rochester. Teachers all across the Monroe
County area have rallied together to criticize Cuomo’s views on our education
system. A rally that was held which was organized by Rochester Teachers
Association, and New York State United Teachers, at the rally teachers across
the area took turns complaining about Cuomo’s expectations of teacher
evaluations. Many teachers stated that their evaluations are too focused on the
students test scores at the end of the year, limiting them to what they can
teach and what they should really focus on not to get a bad evaluation. Some of
the teachers stating that high stressful test taking environments limit a
student’s ability to know the material and actually learn. Many more rallies
have been scheduled not just in the Rochester area but across the state as
well.
Cuomo’s reform focuses a lot on teacher evaluations and if
they work or not. Some teachers claim that the process of an evaluation is
unfair due to different kids learning at different levels. For example, a
poverty kid coming into a public school is already at a disadvantage from all
the other students. Also kids who have a poor home life and that are not
motivated by parents or family to get their schoolwork are also at a
disadvantage. In Governor Cuomo’s plan for better teacher evaluations, he plans
to grant tenure to teachers that receive high evaluations for more than five
consecutive years, also rewarding high performing teachers with bonuses. This all
helping prove that their teaching styles are working and that kids are learning
and passing.
Minimum Wage to nearly double
In 2012 New York State had a poverty rate of 25.9%, the 21st
highest in the United States. Governor Cuomo has created a ten-step plan to
help combat this issue. With St. Lawrence County having the third highest
poverty rate in the state at 21.4%, it is an issue that needs to be addressed
at the state level. The Ten Point Plan was mentioned in the Governors 2015
Opportunity Agenda and outlines the way to battle poverty and fight pay
inequality.
The minimum wage currently stands at $8.75, which was a $.75
increase from the previous $8 that was enacted December 31st 2013. Governor
Cuomo is pushing for an increase in the minimum wage to $10.50 across the state
and $11.50 in New York City. The increase is to keep up with the annual
inflation and residency costs because New York has some of the highest costs of
living. While a reasonable wage is needed to survive, will increasing the minimum
wage drastically help or hurt the economy?
New York City Mayor de Blasio recently went to Governor
Cuomo and asked to pass legislation that would increase minimum wage exceeding
$13 and hour in New York City. The New York Times states that increasing the
minimum wage by such a dramatic increase could halt economic growth and
actually increase the rate of inflation. From 1962 through 2000, a total of 38
years, minimum wage has increased just $3.45. Since 2000, the rate at which
minimum wage has increased is nearly three times what it has been in previous
years.
The City of Oakland California recently increased their minimum
wage to $12.25, a 36% increase from the year before. While this may be good
news from many of the employees, it also can have a negative impact on the
economy. Many people get laid off because companies can not afford to keep
paying these wages, inflation, and the rise of prices for consumer goods. The
SF Gate reports that the city’s booming restaurant industry has already had a
negative impact by these increases.
Restaurants have to increase their prices nearly twenty percent to
account for the minimum wage spike. This is just one example of an industry
that has been effected the SF Gate states and there will be many more to come.
While New York feels the need to increase the wage to a
higher amount to account for the high standards of living, this could also have
a damaging effect. Will wages continue to increase as consumer prices continue
to rise and turn into a never ending spiral? Will Governor Cuomo look at other
cases of minimum wage hikes as a reputable asset or will he ignore it totally
and increase the minimum wage without preforming studies on the possible
effects?
Information retrieved from: https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/2015-opportunity-agenda-restoring-economic-opportunity-5
Monday, March 9, 2015
New York Attorney General Reaches Settlement With Credit Agencies
Today the Attorney Generals office reached a settlement with Equifax Information Services LLC, Experian Information Solutions Inc and TransUnion LLC some of the largest credit reporting agencies that should make life easier for those burdened by medical expenses.
Under the new deal medical debts would not be put on to consumers credit report until after a 180 day waiting period to give time for insurance to pay out. Given that half of bad debt collections on credit reports is associated with medical expenses the should be a relief to those suffering from credit problems.
In addition this settlement gives consumers more leverage to challenge false information in their credit report. Now Credit Reporting Agencies are required to have trained personnel review documents submitted by consumers who have found errors in their reports. Hopefully this will make being the victim of identity theft less of a Kafkaesque experiences.
Under the new deal medical debts would not be put on to consumers credit report until after a 180 day waiting period to give time for insurance to pay out. Given that half of bad debt collections on credit reports is associated with medical expenses the should be a relief to those suffering from credit problems.
In addition this settlement gives consumers more leverage to challenge false information in their credit report. Now Credit Reporting Agencies are required to have trained personnel review documents submitted by consumers who have found errors in their reports. Hopefully this will make being the victim of identity theft less of a Kafkaesque experiences.
The Seaway and ice coverage
Having a cold winter has taken it toll in
many ways. Having the St. Lawrence River located in
the North County, people can see how this winter has had an effect on the river
and ice coverage.
“Ice coverage on the Great
Lakes stood at more than 85 per cent Monday and is expected to peak in early
March. Ice coverage in 2014 reached 92.6 per cent on March 6, the second highest
level on record. But a more persistent cold in 2015 has some scientists
suggesting the all-time record of almost 95 per cent ice coverage set in 1979
could be challenged this year” (Slow start of Seaway Shipping). The Great Lakes
are not the only bodies of water that have ice coverage; the St. Lawrence also
has ice coverage. So what does this mean for the opening of the Seaway, if the
ice doesn’t melt in time, icebreaker might be sent in because the St. Lawrence
River is part of the Seaway system.
When the icebreakers are used,
it is interesting to watch but what about the environment effects that
happened. The Joint Observational Study (JOS) trying to answer the question “Do icebreaking activities and/or ship transits in ice
conditions within the study area cause; 1) Shoreline ice scour and/or 2)
Land-fast ice to break away from shore prematurely?” (Joint Observational
Study: Study Conclusions & Recommendations). What the JOS found was that
icebreakers are not used every year and that “small scale” impacts have occurred
in shallow shorelines with both natural ice break ups and clear-out. Also, “an
inclusive process should continue to be used when setting the Seaway Opening Date,
during which all stakeholders are consulted”, which hasn’t been set yet.
Sources:
Link to news article Ice Slows start of Seaway shipping, http://www.recorder.ca/2015/03/04/ice-slows-start-of-seaway-shipping
Link to Joint Observational Study, http://www.greatlakes-seaway.com/en/environment/observation.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)